-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 275
PARTIAL sync: coreth PR #963,981,1009: nodeType
and related items
#1815
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
PARTIAL sync: coreth PR #963,981,1009: nodeType
and related items
#1815
Conversation
} | ||
|
||
base64LeafsRequest := "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABpbSBST09UaW5nIGZvciB5YQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIFL9/AchgmVPFj9fD5piHXKVZsdNEAN8TXu7BAfR4sZJAAAAIIGFWthoHQ2G0ekeABZ5OctmlNLEIqzSCKAHKTlIf2mZBAA=" | ||
base64LeafsRequest := "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABpbSBST09UaW5nIGZvciB5YQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIFL9/AchgmVPFj9fD5piHXKVZsdNEAN8TXu7BAfR4sZJAAAAIIGFWthoHQ2G0ekeABZ5OctmlNLEIqzSCKAHKTlIf2mZBAAA" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe you can add a test that the old serialization format can be decoded as well. I'm not sure we should make breaking changes to this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm? It's just the padding
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm still concerned about new nodes receiving an old format or old nodes receiving the new format and being unable to properly sync. If this concerned is deemed unimportant/fixed, then this looks good to me
The serialization changes certainly could be breaking - I will defer to @ceyonur. Additionally if they are, maybe the Granite upgrade would work well? |
Why this should be merged
This breaks up #1679